We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
We want to be able to capture these peaks, but as we mentioned, doing an oral glucose tolerance test to capture this is not ideal. Most physicians don't have the time for that. Uh, most patients don't have the time for that, nor do they maybe have the appetite for it either. Um, and it's not representative of real food as we've spoken about.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.