Paul Saladino· MD
yes in that situation I would consider that that's an insulin resistant state independent of their CPAP type which is already garbage in what's that why do you say it's garbage it's type one that back my seat is less than 0.1 right
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
yes in that situation I would consider that that's an insulin resistant state independent of their CPAP type which is already garbage in what's that why do you say it's garbage it's type one that back my seat is less than 0.1 right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.