The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the animal models allow you to really interrogate biochemical process there we can get tissue out in humans i like to be non-invasive with our mr methodology but here sometimes you need to get tissues to measure activities phosphorylation events and and also you have the power of mouse genetics you can knock genes in and out of mice to really rigorously test hypothesis
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.