The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they took out all the sugar in their diet and all of the sugar sweetened beverages in their diet so all they did was take out processed sugar and processed sugar laden drinks they kept macronutrient ratios the same they didn't make these kids low-carb and they kept calories the same isocaloric isocaloric same macronutrients remove fructose remove sugar sweetened beverages within nine days they saw improvements every single marker of insulin sensitivity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
by removing processed sugar from the diet alone by removing fructose from processed sugar they were able to see improvements in all markers of insulin sensitivity within nine days
there are clearly studies on my Robert lustig and others showing that decreased consumption of fructose containing beverages in the United States in kids leads to improvements in insulin sensitivity