Peter Attia· MD
you go back to 1950 you know the incidence of diabetes was 2% I I've seen even data that says it was 1% as as as as recent as 1970 it's very low y but these people were all lean and they're insulin resistant
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you go back to 1950 you know the incidence of diabetes was 2% I I've seen even data that says it was 1% as as as as recent as 1970 it's very low y but these people were all lean and they're insulin resistant
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.