Paul Saladino· MD
the canonical view of insulin resistance is what we just talked about where either your hyperglycemic and/or hyperinsulinemic and that's the type of insulin resistance is canonically studied in the research
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the canonical view of insulin resistance is what we just talked about where either your hyperglycemic and/or hyperinsulinemic and that's the type of insulin resistance is canonically studied in the research
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we use the term insulin resistance right after we acknowledge we don't even know what it means and so what you're really describing is the hyperinsulinemia with compensatory high glucose