The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this is physiologic insulin resistance quote which should be glucose sparing this is a very different state because in this glucose sparing state as you said insulin is low glucose is low yeah right and it's really only the muscle that is refusing glucose it's not you know it and and it's really only the muscle that is becoming resistant to the actions of insulin or saying hey i'm not going to listen to you insulin i'm going to do my free fatty acids right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you don't include carbohydrates in your diet you will develop a type of insulin resistance Now this isn't pathological insulin resistance this is physiologic insulin resistance this is well documented and it's the body conserving that glucose for tissues that like the glucose exclusively or want more of that glucose the brain the testicles the ovaries the adrenal glands the red blood cells