Peter Attia· MD
those functions have been elevated over a period of time or that person maybe male over 50 plus or minus insulin resistant diabetic um those are some of the things that tell us that person needs secondary testing
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
those functions have been elevated over a period of time or that person maybe male over 50 plus or minus insulin resistant diabetic um those are some of the things that tell us that person needs secondary testing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.