The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
is in that data those individuals that have accelerated atherosclerosis are not insulin sensitive like an individual who has a high apob but has the low fasy Insulin good thyroid values and that individual is not to be Apples to Apples compared to this person not to be Apples to Apples compared necessarily because of insulin sensitivity but because of metabolic dysfunction at the level of the macres
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.