The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
my view is basically to tell patients I'm not remotely interested in any of these labels they don't mean anything I don't actually look at hemoglobin a1c except out of the intellectual exercise of contrasting it with this cgm but instead it's that level of insulin fasting postprandial plus glucose postprandial with all of the kinetics that we can track and then layer it into this other stuff which is what's the inflammatory cascade look like
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.