The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Dr Gala talked about walking and continuous walking versus interval walking as well yeah and I think that the study that he was citing shows that just intensity matters but also kind of just interval kind of the interval pattern could be interesting for like uh regulating glucose
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
It's unbelievable to um to to actually think about how beneficial vigorous intensity activity is if you're thinking about, you know, a 10 times efficient. I've seen I know that um there's been a couple of studies showing that vigorous intensity activity, you can do like 15 minutes of vigorous intensity activity and that's equivalent to like 45 minutes of moderate intensity in terms of um glucose regulation. I would say there's even other studies out there showing like a 1:5 ratio as well.