We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
heme iron has only been shown to be a carcinogen in rodent models in which they were fed calcium deficient diets right there's never been a study in humans which showed that heme iron had any teratogenicity in the setting of an adequately nutrient full diet
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the only studies that have shown that heme iron is connected with increased rate of colonic adenoma which free cancerous growths are done in calcium deficient mouse models nothing in humans
different types of endothressolthial compounds heme iron being studied in animal models which are calcium deficient orders of magnitude higher okay so the context around like they they had a really crappy diet you know they were deficient in calcium etc