The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in the carnivores that I have looked at their labs my own labs other people that I work with the iron stores do not go through the roof they're actually pretty darn normal in someone without hemochromatosis your body has the ability to regulate the iron very well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the other criticism leveled against the carnivore diet is the fact that the ferritin may go up on a carnivore diet although ferritin is tightly linked as an inflammatory marker and so we have to take it in the context inflammation if ferritin goes too high or if CRP is elevated economic aid ferritin but generally what I have not seen and Nathan is a good example of this is that generally eating a lot of meat will not cause the iron stores in your body to go too high that is a fallacy
this is to say that you don't really need to worry about iron in my opinion if you're eating lots of meat and organs if you don't have hemochromatosis