Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
you know in this context of genetics and environment that really are are leading that to happen so it's not it's not necessarily looking at whether that in the context of you know a really anti-inflammatory state of ketosis is that really going to lead to cancer development you know in humans i don't think we have any evidence to say one way or the other
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.