The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in Beekman did a beautiful presentation on this at low carb breckenridge and some of the data that he showed was he's got a low carb context and your insulin to glucagon ratio is 1.3 whatever the units were and and you took in some protein and the ratio didn't change but if you look at the context of that study I think it actually changed a tiny tiny bit it didn't change to the decimal points that that we maybe care about
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
well I think it does and I think that the the main determining factor may be the insulin to glucagon ratio