The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
number one fructose does not do much glycation because its levels are so much lower than glucose and number two — it's important to know that if you never spike your blood sugar and you go into ketosis you will end up making even more of these Advanced cation end product so that's not the way you want to go either
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there is also evidence that this Advanced glycation end product that Robert lusting talks about methylglyoxal is increased on ketogenic diets um I've spoken about this in detail on previous podcast I don't want to go into it here but um they they the levels Rose 1.67 fold — with a P value of 03 — um and uh even more significantly — with — levels of ketosis so the first one was on a carbohydrate reduced so 2.12 fold in people who had ketotic levels of carbohydrate restriction