The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that's the problem with population data as you know is you can lose the nuance the nuance is you write what matters to you Dave in the end I don't really care what your LDL is I care about you not getting arthrosclerosis right and if there is indeed someone walking around out there with an LDL cholesterol of 300 who's not getting atherosclerosis and there are indeed examples of that then that's great news
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.