We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I used to be able to say hey I think supplemental Branch chains are are useful and I just I can't I can't support that anymore it just doesn't if you're getting enough total protein in it doesn't seem to be a benefit to supplemental Branch te amino acids the only thing I would say that there might be something is they may reduce muscle soreness
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I used to you know say hey I think supplemental Branch chains are are useful and I just I can't I can't support that anymore just doesn't if you're getting enough total protein in it doesn't seem to be a benefit to supplemental Branch te amino acids
Like, they stuck around as a sports supplement for a long, long time. I think the message is fairly clear now that they're largely...I won't say useless. But from useful to useless, they're a lot closer to the useless end. But it's only the leucine out of those three amino acids that's the important branched-chain amino acid. So, they work because of the leucine.