Peter Attia· MD
and i mean to me the telling data points are that the women survive better from ages zero to five you know that suggests to me that there's something already in place and it probably may not have anything to do
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and i mean to me the telling data points are that the women survive better from ages zero to five you know that suggests to me that there's something already in place and it probably may not have anything to do
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and then that comes to a point you made earlier maybe it's something that happens early in life with high exposure and yeah I mean to me the telling data points are that the women survive better from ages zero to five you know that suggests to me that there's something already in place and it probably had may not have anything to do