The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
one of the things that's most notable about the alcohol-related liver disease population now is they are ridiculously young you know so not only have they drank enough to destroy their liver but they've drank enough to destroy their liver in their 20s and 30s and theirs you know which is a which is a little different than kind of the kind of classic you know 65 year old guy who's been drinking all his life and you know gets to the end of his life
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.