We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
if it's a different pathology underneath there and it doesn't respond the way to ventilation we have a very inefficacious we have a very poorly efficacious therapy and ventilation and for people to say ventilators we need more ventilators we're spending millions and tens of millions probably hundreds of millions of dollars on ventilators right now which may not really save that many lives
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.