We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
it's just not true like it's just not an accurate statement and it's sad because when you look into this and you do a traditional google search like that you get what they're feeding you like I if you do a google search the the first page is really all vegan based websites that are like look at this look at the methane look at all these look at the water utilization that's being used and like it's it's selected data from what they're trying to do misrepresented
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.