The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you sequence if you isolate a virus sequence it and realize it is just the d64 DG thing or the b117 strain something that should have been fully susceptible to immunos to immunity induced by natural infection immunization then one of those two things is true either you had an adequate immune response and lost it or you never really developed an adequate immune response
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.