The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
language impairment may or may not be present in the diagnosis so when you give the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder you also have to clarify whether there is intellectual disability so with or without intellectual disability and then we say with or without language impairment
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when you give the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder you also have to clarify whether there is intellectual disability so with or without intellectual disability and then we say with or without language impairment