The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there was evidence that you also could target other facets of hair loss pathology like the fibrosis that accumulates around hair follicles and prevents the regrowth of hair follicles when they're entering into a new antigen stage this parafollicular fibrosis seems to get progressive as hair loss advances and it's one thing that that finasteride use doesn't really target very effectively
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
this parafollicular fibrosis seems to get progressive as hair loss advances and is one thing that that finasteride use doesn't really target very effectively finasteride targets the hormone dht but once that fibrosis sets in you take away that dht you want to create an opportunity for that hair follicle to resize but it's running out of real estate because fibrosis has set in scar tissue has set in around that miniaturizing hair follicle