We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
so if we were to have a pandemic of something like coronavirus in 2020 we definitely wouldn't want people to be stuck in their homes would we that's the irony here right like we we definitely no one would no one would say that that would be a completely bad recommendation to lock down people in their homes to close parks and public places outdoors to discourage people from going outside like that that would be a really bad idea don't you think
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.