The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And by the way, are there biologic features of the individual that would make that more or less true? Are there some people in whom fillers go away after a year or are you saying that for the most part they last long? That's also another whole complex topic is the metabolism of
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
We see I have patients coming in who don't mention that they've had fillers in the past, but then in surgery I will see filler in their cheek or in the face because they had it eight or 10 years ago and it's still there and it's stretching the ligaments.
The companies will tell you that filler only lasts one year in the face and you have to refill it. That's definitely not true. really we see I have patients coming in who don't mention that they've had fillers in the past but then in surgery I will see filler in their cheek or in their face because they had it eight or 10 years ago and it's still there and it's stretching the ligaments it's changing the structure of the tissues it actually makes routine surgical procedures later more challenging
it's stretching the ligaments it's changing the structure of the tissues it actually makes routine surgical procedures later more challenging