The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so we know that today that's that scalp health is important so that the soil in the forest needs to kind of be fertile and if it's really inflamed or there's inflammation going you have this inflammation going on that can definitely shut down on the follicle and impair hair growth
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you have to look at the scalp and you have to see is this skin tone normal and you know we've taught spend a lot of time talking about hereditary hair loss but there are many other types of hair loss so you know figuring out what's going on in each of these different areas you know requires someone to look at the scalp and see what's happening