Peter Attia· MD
Whereas in the old days, many of us, most of us died more spontaneously. You're very alive, then you're very dead. Not a lot of in between.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Whereas in the old days, many of us, most of us died more spontaneously. You're very alive, then you're very dead. Not a lot of in between.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I mean I can imagine and I think we knew that people died more acutely, but to your point, that's probably because they just didn't have they didn't know they were harboring a tumor or atheroscerosis, whatever else.