The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Also because of how fine uh of a problem it is, like how um precise it has to be. Um, we're talking about a single cell, you know, a couple of microns in uh diameter and you've got an electrode. Any microotion at all, anything changes that. And so typically what we see with a lot of those systems that record from those is that there's a lot of turnover from day to day or hour to hour.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.