Peter Attia· MD
they said maybe the reason they're sedentary is because again the losing calories into the fat tissue the fat tissue has been is creating a sort of vacuum and the animal is responding either by eating more or exercising less
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they said maybe the reason they're sedentary is because again the losing calories into the fat tissue the fat tissue has been is creating a sort of vacuum and the animal is responding either by eating more or exercising less
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
hetherington and ransom had animals that got obese independent of the hyperphagia
the counter argument to the hyperphagia causes obesity evidence is obesity being caused in the absence of hyperphagia okay so what ransom and uh heatherington argued is