The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we evolved as a species to starve I mean our existence today is dependent on our ability to go long periods of time without eating that anymore but but yeah yeah and it seems that our ability to access minerals and vitamins is highly dependent on our nutritional state in other words your need for those things tends to go up in a fed state yeah at least according to some research I've seen yeah
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.