Peter Attia· MD
the other thing he says that's abjectly untrue is that there were no pre-clinical or animal studies on these particular vaccines or mrna constructs and that those are findable they're all there so that's just simply not true
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the other thing he says that's abjectly untrue is that there were no pre-clinical or animal studies on these particular vaccines or mrna constructs and that those are findable they're all there so that's just simply not true
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.