The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so that was the method that kind of started to clear out the industry if you will moving some of those literally oil treatments tonics and so forth that had no clinical efficacy whatsoever out of the market because now if in order to advertise hair growth you had to have that FDA clearance you had to have the FDA approval behind you
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you alluded to Rogaine being the first drug or topical agent that actually had clinical efficacy which therefore I think you described it a very nicely as the beginning of the end of snake oil not the end but at least the first shot across the bow that this could be a legitimate industry correct