The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and now think of it as in our analogy where we were sanding a wooden eye before now think of the cornea as a book and in prk i'm removing the first 10 pages now i open it to page 100 and i'm taking out 100 through 110 and then i close the book the beauty of lasik is that because that that the tissue removal is sequestered under that flap the body doesn't perceive that anything has been done so it's very typical for patients who have lasik to be 20 20 the next morning
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.