The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we know that the radiation coming out of your Wi-Fi router the radiation coming out of your cell phone is microwave radiation it's like a little microwave in your hand you know the microwaves you had when you were a kid that you could make water boil in or you can make aluminum foil explode in yeah that's in your hand that's a Wi-Fi router in your house
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but we're not bathed in microwave radiation to the level that's coming off your cell phone or your Wi-Fi router you can measure this I have a EMF meter I have my house and measure it if I turn my Wi-Fi router off and I hardwire all my devices if I hardwire my computer so there's no Wi-Fi on in my house the Wi-Fi antenna is off on the computer the bluetooth is off it's very low 05 microwatt per met squar it's it's measurable this is microwave radiation as opposed to the other radiation that we're bathed in
this is microwave radiation as opposed to the other radiation that we're bathed in Alpha Beta gamma particles yeah of course these are different things