Peter Attia· MD
if you really want to be proficient at 50 yards with a bow and arrow practice at 100 and you'll be amazed at how simple 50 becomes and 60 and 70 and 80 it's a very nonlinear relationship in terms of accuracy with a bow and arrow
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you really want to be proficient at 50 yards with a bow and arrow practice at 100 and you'll be amazed at how simple 50 becomes and 60 and 70 and 80 it's a very nonlinear relationship in terms of accuracy with a bow and arrow
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you're an ace at 100 yards, it's like shooting fish in a barrel at 40 yards.