Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
will it be functional muscle um and and to that extent will it be functional bone so even if you know a drug like beema or an igf1 Agonist or um some of these other drugs or molecules that are being touted potentially increase muscle size it's not clear that they're going to increase strength function um and and and bony composition
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.