Peter Attia· MD
We wait too long based based on our own stated goals of feeling at peace and having some comfort towards the end and not wasting our time doing things that don't help us.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We wait too long based based on our own stated goals of feeling at peace and having some comfort towards the end and not wasting our time doing things that don't help us.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So it's very often that the physicians don't bring up hospice until way late in the game.
Yeah, I would say as as in broad strokes unequivocally in general, the answer is yes. I think we know that patients and families wait too long. they're suffering more than they need to and taking on treatments that are no longer helping them for a longer period of time that there's a what can feel like a charade portion of care.