Peter Attia· MD
That's obviously much more, but it's a lifetime presum, okay? So five years worth of treatment basically. So, it's cheaper in the long run to do a fat graft presumably.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
That's obviously much more, but it's a lifetime presum, okay? So five years worth of treatment basically. So, it's cheaper in the long run to do a fat graft presumably.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Now, with the advent of fillers, the volume of fat grafting we do goes down. But I just did a lady yesterday, and I'll tell you why. On her, she came in, she had never had anything before and she was hollow everywhere. So, yes, we could use seven uh 69. Okay? So, yes, we could use lots of fillers, but she'll spend a small fortune putting a lot of fillers in her face over time.