Paul Saladino· MD
it's very held intensive and thoughtful and that's part of the reason that the efficacy rates are as good as they are because of the consistency and the thoroughness
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's very held intensive and thoughtful and that's part of the reason that the efficacy rates are as good as they are because of the consistency and the thoroughness
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.