The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this guy game Brown in North Dakota he doesn't to buy seed he doesn't to buy fertilizer he doesn't have to buy glyphosate he doesn't to buy pesticides he doesn't eat a lot of irrigation because it's oil holds so much water he has a diverse ecosystem of animals and plants that he can grow and sell and make a profit that's more than the others
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.