The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But I think this is just the tip of an iceberg, and many of the complex diseases that we call a multi-factorial diseases because we don't know what causes them such as heart disease and even maybe some cancers are caused by a combination of genetic risk factors coming from within the body and food and microbial components that contribute to a second hit, which leads to the clinical manifestations of these diseases.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.