We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I get a little frustrated when the medical community that's anti- early screening or or screening and early detection poooo it based on what I still think are impressive numbers the number you you state because that's sort of like saying you know um you know there's too many fatalities in cars we shouldn't drive right it's just it just doesn't make any sense
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I get a little frustrated when the medical community that's anti-early screening or screening and early detection poop who's it based on what I still think are impressive numbers the number you you state because that's sort of like saying you know um you know there's too many fatalities in cars we shouldn't drive right it's just it just doesn't make any sense