The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are great radiologist scientists you're friends with one of them Raj who have and others have shown that you don't necessarily need the contrast right and that a on average a T2 uh and the Dynam the diffusion weighted Imaging are nearly as good not identical but nearly as good at evaluating the prostate for any risky lesions
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the key um you know parameters that we look at T2 images you look at diffusion weighted Imaging and dynamic contrast enhancement those are the three components of a multiparametric MRI