The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are hints to human genetics lying within that and it gives you new tools for thinking about about and then working out ideas about the ways in which your inheritance modifies your aging and maybe even your response to drugs
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's a set of collaborators including Rob Williams at Tennessee and Johan a in Switzerland uh which have taken the mice we've given them uh at this point something like 12,000 tals 20 12,000 DNA samples from mice that have a known lifespan and they have already published a paper it came out last year in science and there's another one in the pipeline now that says oh look here's a gene that tells you how long the females will live here's a gene that tells you how long males and females will live here's a gene that tells you how long you live but it only counts if you've made it past the midpoint it only works on the oldest half half of the mice