Peter Attia· MD
and we knew that untreated uh STDs were a big reason um and that was a very important thing is the reason going back to these 16-year-old girls is the reason that the sexual heterosexual
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and we knew that untreated uh STDs were a big reason um and that was a very important thing is the reason going back to these 16-year-old girls is the reason that the sexual heterosexual
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And particularly there was a hypothesis that if it was heterosexually transmitted there was something to do with sexually transmitted diseases um and that there was something about increasing your risk if you had untreated STDs sexually transmitted diseases