The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
my guest on this week's podcast as i say in this podcast is perhaps the closest thing he is perhaps the closest thing that i've had uh on the podcast seeing in an indiana jones uh maybe i'll have somebody else who rivals him in the indiana jones status but dr bell schindler has a phd in archaeology he co-starred in national geographic's show the great human race which was actually kind of interesting concept that you can find on youtube from four or five years ago
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
my book is coming out next month it's called eat like a human nourishing foods and ancestral ways of cooking to revolutionize your health and we i dive deep into all the things we talked about today it starts off with a lot of information about our ancestral dietary past and then every section after that is divided into different sort of groups of food plants animals grains maize those dairy and i talk a lot about the pre-history and history of those foods in our diets um what we have to look out for how we can mitigate certain things and then every chapter ends with a whole host of tips and recipes to take you know it's great to talk about these things but it's another thing to take this information and make it useful in your own home so that you can do things to nourish yourself and your family as much as possible