The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I can't believe it's 1 and 36 because I've been doing this in for 25 years I can never keep track of the numbers i h every time I went to every time I go to an annual meeting the number changes um and is one in 36 now what the CDC said in 2020 so I'm going to I'm going to go with whatever numbers you take I I'll believe your numbers more than mine um the point being that it the numbers has CH the numbers have changed drastically
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.