The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they're basically saying we completely disagree that the case fatality rate is one to two percent we think that the infection fatality rate is probably closer to that of influenza 0.12 0.2 0.3 percent because we believe that there are far more impatient Ematic people out there than we appreciate therefore creating a much larger denominator
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.